I usually hold updates until evening, but this Sunday has already dropped too much news to sit on. I’m sending this to you in real time because it matters.
If this independent reporting is valuable to you, please consider subscribing. Your support is the only engine that keeps this work moving, and as this White House wants me to stay silence, your support let’s me speak out without fear. We’re building something rare and powerful together. There are big projects ahead, and your support is what brings them to life.
Subscribe
First , the Department of Agriculture has now sent states an order: immediately undo any actions taken to provide full food stamp benefits to low-income families. Not next week. Not soon. Immediately.
The memo was written with the urgency of a threat. It warned states that they could face financial penalties if they didn’t comply fast enough. Officials in multiple states are now confused, frustrated, and trying to determine whether this directive would once again disrupt funding for SNAP, the program that keeps food on the table for roughly 42 million Americans.
This comes after a week of whiplash for families relying on help to feed their children. Because the Trump administration refused to fully fund SNAP during the shutdown, benefits stalled. Then a federal judge ordered the administration to restore full funding for the month. States like New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin scrambled to release payments. Many families waited days. Some went without groceries at all.
Now the rules are shifting again. Governors and state agencies are asking the same question families are asking: Will the benefits arrive next month? Or is the safety net being quietly cut, thread by thread?
Food assistance isn’t a luxury. It’s survival. When a government plays tug-of-war with a program that feeds one in eight Americans, the harm isn’t theoretical. It’s immediate. It lands in kitchens, lunchboxes, and empty pantries.
Second, Judge Mark Wolf, appointed by Ronald Reagan in 1985, a figure long respected across the conservative legal world, resigned his lifetime post. Not stepping aside due to age. Not retiring with honors. He resigned because he believes the country has reached a point where silence is no longer compatible with conscience.
In a striking and unusually candid essay, Wolf wrote:
“President Donald Trump is using the law for partisan purposes, targeting his adversaries while sparing his friends and donors from investigation, prosecution, and possible punishment. This is contrary to everything that I have stood for in my more than 50 years in the Department of Justice and on the bench… Silence, for me, is now intolerable.”
Judges almost never speak like this. They are trained to avoid public political commentary, to let rulings speak for them. For a judge appointed by Reagan to drop shield and sword at once, to abandon the lifetime appointment he once expected to hold until death, sends a warning that cannot be shrugged off.
This isn’t coming from a liberal firebrand or a partisan pundit. It’s coming from the heart of the conservative legal establishment. When someone with that pedigree says the rule of law is under threat, the country should pay attention.
Third, Donald Trump is becoming increasingly isolated in the White House. The Republican Party that once held its breath and followed his impulses is now more willing to step away, especially as Trump’s approval numbers slide and his term shrinks into lame-duck territory.
Hill Republicans are openly pushing back against his demands. Some refuse to support his calls to abolish the filibuster. Others are distancing themselves from his most extreme rhetoric. A few will no longer answer his late-night phone calls, even when he rings repeatedly at 3 a.m. to vent or demand loyalty.
Inside his circle, aides are exhausted. Some are looking for exits. Others are simply tuning him out. A president who once commanded near-total obedience from his party now finds himself shouting into an echo chamber where fewer and fewer people are listening.
An isolated president is not a predictable president. And unpredictability at the highest office always finds its way into people’s lives, whether in policy decisions, legal strategy, or late-night orders sent down to agencies already strained by chaos.
If you value this kind of reporting, I hope you’ll support it. We’re building a community that insists on clarity, honesty, and depth even when the headlines feel overwhelming. Your subscription is what keeps this work not just alive, but strong enough to rise to moments like this.
Subscribe
More is coming. And together, we’ll meet it head-on.