Good afternoon. I spent much of the morning reviewing the latest tranche of Jeffrey Epstein–related documents released overnight. Several of these filings contain information that materially advances public understanding of how wide-ranging—and how unfinished—the Epstein investigation remains. This is the story demanding attention right now.
From the outset, my reporting has been survivor-first. That means some sensational or salacious material circulating online is not included here because it does not meaningfully advance accountability or justice. What follows are documents that do.
An Epstein survivor, Haley Robson, publicly called this afternoon for the impeachment of Donald Trump, underscoring the renewed political consequences of these disclosures.
At the same time, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, who previously opposed broader transparency around the Epstein files, is now condemning efforts to keep portions of the records sealed, calling those responsible “evil.”
Document 1: Ten Co-Conspirators Identified—But Hidden
The most significant revelation in today’s release is confirmation that ten alleged co-conspirators were investigated by both the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Justice in connection with Epstein’s crimes.
All ten remain redacted.
This disclosure alone fundamentally alters the public narrative. Epstein was not treated by federal investigators as a lone predator, yet no comprehensive accounting of these individuals has ever been provided to the public—or, critically, to survivors.
Document 2: Evidence of Systematic Abuse
Another filing details the extreme and repeated abuse endured by girls and young women within Epstein’s network. The document offers a stark reminder that behind every legal maneuver and political argument are real people whose lives were permanently altered.
This material is disturbing—but essential—to understanding why transparency matters.
Document 3: Emails Linking Epstein’s Circle to a British Royal
A series of emails from August 2001 show correspondence between Ghislaine Maxwell and an individual using the alias “A,” communicating from an address labeled “The Invisible Man.”
The emails suggest connections to the British royal family. The sender is not explicitly identified as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, but Maxwell introduced him to Epstein in 1999, when she was Epstein’s girlfriend.
In one email, “A” writes:
“How’s LA? Have you found me some new inappropriate friends? Let me know when you are coming over as I am free from 25th August until 2nd Sept and want to go somewhere hot and sunny with some fun people before having to put my nose firmly to the grindstone for the Fall.”
CNN reports it has attempted to contact representatives for Mountbatten-Windsor for comment.
Document 4: Subpoena to Mar-a-Lago
Included in the release is a previously undisclosed 2021 subpoena issued to the Mar-a-Lago Club as part of the federal investigation into Maxwell.
Dated October 5, 2021, the subpoena demands “any and all employment records” relating to an individual whose name is redacted. The filing does not indicate whether the club complied or what materials, if any, were provided.
The absence of follow-up documentation raises unresolved questions.
Document 5: Epstein’s Brother Alleges Murder
In 2023, Epstein’s brother, Mark Epstein, contacted the FBI asserting his belief that Epstein was murdered in custody.
According to the document, he told the FBI:
“I have reason to believe he was killed because he was about to name names. I believe President Trump authorized is [sic] murder.”
No evidence supporting this claim is presented in the filing, and it remains an allegation—not a finding.
These documents collectively point to a case that was larger, more complex, and more politically sensitive than the public has been led to believe. They also reinforce a central truth survivors have long maintained: accountability has been partial, selective, and incomplete.
The question now is not whether more names exist—but why they remain hidden.
And who is being protected.